ATENTIE !

Toate postarile de pe acest blog sunt cumva interconectate. Inainte de a eticheta sau critica vreo afirmatie aparent radicala, cititi si prin arhiva, pentru a obtine o viziune de ansamblu a mesajului general.

marți, 13 martie 2012

An article about social movements and human values - by Luca Oprea

Many have asked, repeatedly, with either disgust or confusion, what good could ever come of the ongoing Spanish and Greek “popular uprisings”, the European Revolution, the Wall Street Occupation. Long before there was ever a talk of lack of demands, there was talk about the lack of possible solutions. Even talk of a lack of possible outcomes. What change can there be from powerless, futureless young people desperately massing together without a cause?

But that question doesn’t matter -it simply doesn’t matter what anyone thinks or says about this, what anyone computes and approximates, because as long as people are doing it, it’s the most basic, most fundamental human response possible. With lack of outcomes, and unnatural, abusive complexity encroaching from all directions, the only thing left to do is to soundly reject it.

And that rejection, although not many saw it as dignified at first – is essentially dignified, because it stems from a silent and primordial statement of human value. In fact, it is not rejection, and it is not a statement, it is pure being – being unto itself, being in the name of values which are universal and go beyond the discursive paradigm of any particular situation, it is being that is self-referential in the way that natural rights and citizenship are self-referential, because they have self-nature – they are, no matter what, a reflection of higher good which transcends the barriers of history, political systems, and false justice enforced through threat of terror and death.

It doesn’t matter who does this, as long as it gets done. Your names and faces and place of origin, your skills and your age, the ways in which you may be defined by your lacks and faults, criticized for them, none of it matters while you’re standing up for pure, simple being, because the importance and beauty of being there – of occupying the public spaces which belong not to a narrative of centralized greed, but to one of refined human civilization – begins with the pouring of energy into space, opening it up, then flowing further into minds and opening those up.

The basic, fundamental, undeniable and unavoidable flow of life is primary biological production. Primary production is the ability of plants and certain bacteria to create biological matter without consuming other life forms, to directly transform sunlight, heat, and physical substances from the air and earth into living tissue. Without primary production there can be no life, there can be no food and there can be no economy. Through design of ecosystems we can take advantage of primary production and channel it into ever-evolving webs of natural complexity – creating vibrant health and beauty.

Money is a virtualization of the basic energy flows of primary biological production, human work and energy production,  but money is generally a very poor design system, and disastrous when it comes to creating and sustaining life. As money also virtualizes work ability and intellect, it can and does separate human experience and human mental powers from primary production flows, even pitting them against each other, creating fundamental flaws in biological production and human life, leading to global social imbalances and aberrant human development that spirals down into avalanches of increased personal and social tension. Money and capital are not a working replacement for the mind’s innate ability to work with and design the natural world.

They suffocate it.

Occupy Wall Street can be seen as a basic, natural, global response to this fundamentally flawed state of things. The mindless segregation of life and energy flows from human consciousness is what led to the existence of the flowing crowds of Spain and Greece and Portugal and the rest of Europe. They have very little past and no apparent future, and as such cannot be understood through economic theory, although they are created by it. Fundamentally, human communities should cover the full spectrum of evolving life, from primary biological production, through innately collaborative social life, to consciousness and then mind.

Instead, the current state of things sees rural and urban areas feeding off of each other in production cycles that deplete the earth, social ties, and individual lives. The reason is simple – while they may appear to be separate and different communities, in fact they are only one community, its production and social flows stretching over very long distances. Capitalism speaks of competition, consumption, business and trade as essential factors which create value, but the reality is that these are low level processes which only make sense between partially developed communities.

All societies are completely based on and limited by primary production. Our complex, spatially spread out combination of urban areas and food production towns are no more fundamentally complex than any basic community, except that the energy flows are so complicated and weak, and social interaction so indirect, that at first glance its pieces seem completely unrelated, and its life processes are almost completely hidden.

Trade ties two societies into one – it turns two societies that have been unsuccessful at internally designing their structure and fulfilling their needs into two interdependent pieces of one slightly more evolve whole. But this interdependence is always poorly designed itself, and it only leads to more and more aberrant development – loss of jobs, loss of life and work standards, loss of ecosystems in the search for a competitive edge – this is the downwards spiral of destruction of value and life on all levels. Trade is only an example that is very dear to the “minds” of corporate economists the world over – in a low-level society, such as ours, consumption and business follow the same deadly patterns and are ultimately more destructive several times over.

Capitalism, by quantifying and virtualizing work, disengages it from its fundamental human potential and purpose, thereby reducing our interactions to transactions that are lossy, fearful, and antagonistic. You cannot disconnect consumption from consciousness without creating low level, inhuman chaos. This is friction, and friction generates heat.

The friction of large masses of people and mass-produced goods is the inevitable heat death of capitalism. If heat-death isn’t a strong enough word for you, know that capitalism is nothing more than a weak bully on a collision course with the mother of all forest fires. All the failures and abuses of capitalism are due to its fundamental inefficiency in dealing with energy flows, its unintelligent design, and its simple, pure weakness.

In a fundamentally good society, all functions are created with awareness that there is a human imperative and a life imperative – the both the life and potential of human beings and other beings are at stake, that the way we construct our society and cultivate our evolution is exactly what our destiny will be. Our destiny and that of countless generations to come, which, born in a place with no true avenues for human development, for the development of our innate strength and beauty, will be more and more stunted.

Your  future is human, or it isn’t.

Primary production has to be channeled through intelligently designed, sustainable biological systems, resulting in higher complexity flows of matter and energy.

Healthy and abundant food, clean and abundant energy, available at ground level – produced at the most basic level, not as the result of complicated and inefficient political-corporate systems. The highest expression of primary biological production is social usefulness, its ability to support higher levels of human existence. Social usefulness as a design quality and system value is the opposite of the friction and competition of capitalism. Thus, primary production is transformed into human value, it supports consciousness as an universal and fundamental factor of existence, of humanity, refinement and pleasure. And above consciousness comes the ultimate adaptive, knowing and governing structure of any society, the mind. Fully developed to its potential and power, it responds to surrounding systems and stressors while maintaining the fundamental values which are its actual substance – mind perfectly reflects and perfectly protects life.

You’ll be told business creates value. It doesn’t.

Societies, culminating in the transcendent human mind, are what create and sustain value. Business is no substitute for society.

Segregated urban/agrarian communities are supposed to lead to rapid technological and mental advancements by focusing certain kind of higher-level activities in a single, highly urbanized area, but the technological advances that happen in this way are almost completely separate from and unaware of the primacy of human life. Any value they create is purely related to form and formal functions, and mostly relegated to those places which already have value, and therefore can purchase more of it. This leads to towers of derivative value, layer upon layer of it, with no connection to primary production, human values and healthy, prosperous and purposeful communities. By not cultivating full human beings, with consciousness and mental potentials that can transcend paradigms and solve fundamental issues, these urban accumulations of technological value are relegating their historical status to third rate also-rans.

And while that in itself doesn’t mean much, the loss of life and loss of potential of life which will undeniably result from it,  is the very definition of tragic – the classical meaning of tragedy refers to the fulfillment of that which is fundamentally wrong, to the detriment and ultimate destruction of fundamentally good human factors, which were present all along and could have turned the tide at almost any point if only they had been aware of and acted upon their inherent potential.  This tragedy is ticking right now, on its last legs,  ready to implode or explode or melt and show its immensely fragile and deadly structure.

But our society never leads to problem solving, or even a preoccupation with problem solving. We are preoccupied with form, and the functions of our forms are only meant to aid in the consumption and production of more forms. This is the result of an entropic, almost morbid preoccupation with existence as a simple drive to fulfill desires, and it comes from the lack of cultivation of consciousness in our current world. Even architecture, one of our pursuits which is closest to pure form – is perennially caught in a form-function dichotomy – and cannot seem to reason its way towards an understanding of a fundamental human form, which would include beauty (a consciousness-enabled understanding of form transcending tension) and usefulness (a consciousness-enabled understanding of multiple functions as coalescing into a higher level of social/human purpose).

The full framework of understanding required for inter-disciplinary action is never given – the mere existence of people completely segregated into disciplines suggests that even the framework for wanting to solve problems rarely exists. Most of the time, we are not aware of the need for making things right – and it even seems to us that it is contradictory to the commonly held belief that a constant state of pressure is what leads to evolution in the first place. This is the backwards rationalizing of an entropic system whose race towards the unknown is fueled only by the pressure of it own unconscious and unconscientious destruction.

Even when someone does awaken enough to want to solve the riddle of the state of things, our understanding of ourselves and the world, being caught somewhere between derivative forms and derivative desires, does not allow for it.

Business then, is very ineffective consumption, and even more ineffective in the creation of high level human values and human existence. The very fact that human existence depends on competitive consumption practices and their accompanying virtualized mathematical models is ridiculous, laughable, and murderous. It murders life in the most direct way, and it keeps consciousness and mental powers from evolving – the very things that can challenge the death built into the system. That can overturn its ineffectiveness.

Existence, life, cannot depend on an entropic process. It’s a deadly logical flaw.

The human mind isn’t meant to build a slightly better gizmo. Wall street will have you believe that business finances people with ideas. But ideas going through countless business and manufacturing loops, energy being lost at every one of them – is not what the mind is about. As modern wisdom goes, it’s said that you could not have the current level of human development without massive urban concentrations. But even putting aside the fact that the way we sustain these urban centers is not developed at all, that our agriculture and social practices and political process are all primitive and result in a very low level of human existence, human interconnection, and friendly care for each other – putting all this aside, we are still left with a fallacy. It’s not the crude massing of forms – urban forms and processes – that leads to mental development, but focus on the mind itself.

Corporations are the shadow of a shadow of a shadow, drawing virtualized profits from virtualized transactions with virtualized people. There can be no community where human time is divided between corporations and entertainment services. There is no citizenship there, no natural rights, no real room for consciousness to evolve, embracing all other human potential. Freedom of expression, creativity and design are counted in monetary value, in a mindless squabble where friendly understanding is reduced to the insane act of having to sell each other things – or worse – knowledge and education – just to survive.

Our countless failures in every field, and in the field of putting it all together and solving the world’s issues, shows that the focus is not on the mind, not on the world, not on humans, but rather on the process of urban existence, consumption, accumulation of status and goods. For all those of you having a knee-jerk reaction at this attack on some of your favorite things, I’ll simply have to add that an evolved consciousness and a strong mind trump all these phenomena of modern life, in the most pleasurable and natural way possible.

Community, small or large, rural or urban, endowed or not with beautiful architecture and a variety of goods, can only solve its problems and the world’s problems by focusing on mind, biological life, and human existence as being the fundamental theoretical units of our understanding. By focusing on consciousness and mind, we can grow it to high levels anywhere. Ultra-high capital science is only needed in a desperate scramble to offset the issues created by our fundamentally flawed, entropic design, and ultra-high capital science could be much more easily sustained by a world without fundamental flaws. It would correspond to a human imperative instead of a consumption imperative.

The powers of the human mind, modern or otherwise, are not a result of capitalism or technological improvements. Never be fooled into believing that.

Our creative avenues, from art to design to entertainment, from journalism to entrepreneurship to social activism, from science to construction to ecology, from film to documentary to intimate individual life, are all flawed, because they have evolved, as we have, in a system that has no direct contact with humanity. Our creative avenues are derivative, endlessly derivative and frail, at odds with giving birth to answers, or beauty, or even a cry for help.

The reason? we are so remote from direct, inclusive understanding, from leaps of faith and intuition, that we cannot comprehend ourselves as a whole and as part of a whole. A theory of solving everything can only start with the basis of what it means to be human, and what it means to be alive. These are things that have self-nature, whereas starting from the current system and trying to rearrange its pieces in some meaningful way cannot work – very few of those pieces have any self-meaning.

Mostly they are derivatives. Financial derivatives are only one sort of derivative – a derivative, of any kind, is what happens when unprincipled, weak men of little cultivated human potential are set loose upon the world for several generations. It’s an evolutionary process at the level of form – the form of the world is changed so much that it becomes completely unrelated to its original life-giving function.

Society has the duty of directly and immediately addressing its fundamental problems, and in doing so eventually reaching the highest level of human development and understanding. Any society that doesn’t do that will eventually crumble under its own weight – the weight of generations that do not fulfill their potential. For a society to stand the test of time, and reach permanence, it needs to tackle the ever renewing flow of basic biology, by educating the inflows, helping them evolve, and in this way avoiding the build-up of tension and opposites. We are born as basic biology – small and uncultivated – but full of potential. If we are not grown as humans, able and involved, then we become passive or destructive, useless, lost, dirty, we rot away generations at a time, not even knowing where the blame lies.

The entropic nature of any society that doesn’t transform its low-level biological flows leads to ingrained systemic destruction of value on all possible levels, then change through revolution, or a system cleanse through war.

In this sense, Occupy Wall Street and the European Revolution are an attempt to stop the destruction of value through a spontaneous shaking up of that biological human level, which right now, on a global level, is stale and fearful and fragile and has been the target of systematic abuse.

Many of us are born in what are known as democratic republics. A republic guarantees the primacy of fundamental individual rights. There is no majority that can ever take that away. A republic understands the mental potential of the individual as being the basic building block of human society, and the life of the individual as being an inviolable asset. No thought or majority decision can violate structures of life and mind, because thoughts and decisions are below such structures. A democracy allows for full expression, and for uninhibited decision regarding one’s own destiny. It does not allow for power over another’s life or mind. An individual must cultivate his understanding of things so that he can express democratic choice without making the mistake of threatening the fundamental rights of others through that choice. The choice of the majority over a minority can only happen when the decision does not threaten individual rights, or the fundamental values of a democracy or a republic. And the final result is that no cultivated individual would take such decisions, and indeed such decisions can only happen when uncultivated minds are exposed to desperate situations.

We must not say that we are right because a 51% majority can rule over any 49% minority – the history of war has proven that one to be wrong many times over – but because both our natural rights and our democratic process has been tampered with and destroyed by a minority which has long stopped upholding the ideals of a democratic republic.

That we are a majority is a good thing, something to bolster our courage, but what we want is in line with the ideals of justice, not with dominating the individual rights of a minority. We have no relation to their rights – their rights are far from the issue – since they have no right to tamper with the lawful processes which create prosperity for all. It is good that we are a majority, that 99% of people are in a similar situation, whether they realize it or not, but the situation is economically and socially deadly, so it should not take a majority to speak up against it. Fundamental rights allow even the smallest minority of one to speak up against things that seek to destroy the balance of a democratic republic.

So do not pride yourself simply on majority, but on the truth of the justice you seek. On the other hand, our society has a glorious track record of ignoring truth, so make sure you pride yourself on majority as well.

A citizen is inherently part of a community. A citizen is important through his potential, all his innate human potential – the powers that human beings are capable of developing – but equally important, he is the fundamental unit of that community. With a breakdown of the community, there is a certain chance that a human might continue living with his internal structure unharmed, but a community’s structure is completely destroyed once you break down the citizen.

If, with courage, you win the battle for people’s consciousness, and then, with unrelenting focus, you win the battle of minds for the right to plan and enact a future, then there is a chance you will see the day when you can change the physical make-up of reality into something fundamentally right, fundamentally healthy, and fundamentally human – with no glaring flaws of design and understanding, no overcomplicated yet underachieving structures, no giant leaks at every corner, wasting huge, murderous percentages of our life-flows and potentials, and then damming and damning them, locking them up altogether when the flow reaches the right point in the rigged system.

Compromise will have to come on part of the government, in the form of an adaptation to human values. An adaptation to the necessary ideal of citizenship as the functional unit that drives all processes within a society. This is called transcendence. America was founded by humans who transcended all the mental and moral limitations of the world they lived in. They opened up space, created a complex civilization in it, and took care to imbue it with the ideals that would create more transcendent men in generations to come, men who would refresh the values and processes of their civilization.

This transcendence is merely the wisdom that comes with truly being human, open and enduring over a certain period of time.

Have it.

It is more and more yours with every day you spend opening up squares and cities and souls and minds.

An entropic system erodes all life and all values. It erodes ecosystems, it erodes communities, and then it erodes vision and hope, and finally, when all true mental power is gone from the system, and all that is left are impotent derivatives, there also lingers an idea that, once, greatness used to be possible. And with that idea, all that is left is the most simple and biological of courage, and the only way I could describe this courage would be by saying it is akin to that of cell colonies divided by toxic space, yet still fearlessly projecting the greatness of the natural immensity they once came from.

This is the courage of Occupy Wall Street and the European Revolution. Perhaps it is not yet high minded, and it may not be fully clean and refined, not beyond the reproach of those who can afford perfect formal cleanliness to offset the horrendous dirt of the jobs they perform in this world. It may not be calm and composed, and therefore worthy of our neutered politics and sterile, homicidal military-industrial complex.

It is a strange and unexpected courage, confused, but it has a heart which is beating. First with angst, then with courage, and now with hope – which, when you look at how hopelessly misguided our civilization-building efforts have been for the past century, and centuries before that, when you look at massing police forces and then at how small and fragile each of these people are, the so-called 99% – this hope might seem ridiculous.

Don’t be fooled by sound-bytes. There is no 1% and 99%. There is no inclusion and exclusion, there is no economic reform that will safely and painlessly save this mess. There are no clean-cut demands to be made, because there isn’t a system currently capable of enacting them. And there can be no talk of the opposite of capitalism being socialism, when capitalism itself is so morally bankrupt that the only thing which can oppose it is desperate, raging humanism.

A friend who almost died in the Romanian revolution of 1989 told me that, after having been captured and taken outside the city during his second day of being on the streets, as he was literally being trampled and bludgeoned to death by soldiers, the many tens of thousands of workers of Bucharest finally came out into the streets. this saved him, as it forced the soldiers to abandon the beating, leaving him with a severely cracked skull and seconds away from his death. The way he recounted it to me is, he can never truthfully think of that time in terms other than anyone not participating that day, anyone not coming out into the streets, was for his death, and for the death of many others, and death in general, whereas each of those who did march saved him, and saved many others. I thought of this as I watched Spanish women being beaten by police, hit over their faces with riot sticks, and at that moment, and for a long time afterwards, I wished I could have been there and taken every one of those hits in their place.

I still do now, as I remember, because human pain is also transcendent, and therefore, any society that has no direct and immediate solutions for the homeless man living down the street as winter approaches, but has only sly, abusive rhetoric whose projected effects are measured in decades, is simply not a human society.

It isn’t human.

Beyond demands, further global action is needed in the same spirit and with the same sense of immediacy that the Wall Street Occupation has. Turn this into direct action democracy, E-democracy, turn this into a social justice platform capable of homing in on any level of injustice with massive multi-regional force, turn this into pledges from both social groups and local government, turn it into local currency, into community creation, into support and creation of the kind of economic and social platforms that citizenship requires. Turn it into a virtual platform for the creation of justice and prosperity and human values, leveraging the many skills and potentials and situations that everyone, literally, everyone everywhere has. This is open source prosperity, the only kind there is.

While broadscale economic reform needs to happen, it’s much more important to simply stop the massive destruction of value, immediately – with no more bailouts followed by seizing of property, both on a personal scale, with home foreclosures and massive job loss, and on a national scale, with sale of historical and social assets, as is happening in Greece.

There are current reforms and actions that can be enacted by our governments with immense and immediate effects on all levels of society. This could be done by transcending the relationship between debt and infrastructure, forgetting conversations on debt altogether and focusing on building infrastructure with high social relevance. Add to this a transition to an international model of cooperation instead of coercion, replacing planned international interdependency based on debt with a higher trust model, and understand that even in the stock market, planned trust is more valuable than planned debt, since the stock market is so volatile when it comes to global human factors.

But even working within the debt model, there are continents of people young and old, students, workers and entrepreneurs and farmers, intellectuals and scientists that can rebuild a functioning economy given the right freedom and support. Even capitalism can work out when it is conscientious and happens within the framework of a democratic republic, not that of a corporate dictatorship. Capitalism and corporatism are very different animals.

Despite the inherent design flaws of our current system, it could still be more productive, gentler on ecosystems and human beings, and ultimately result in more capital/monetary gain for all involved. Making it work that way is essential to gaining and spreading the resources needed for building fundamentally human communities, on all levels. And the only way of getting government to act in a sane, constitutional and human manner is to keep protesting, keep occupying, keep opening up spaces, keep being human and standing up for rational human ideals. This in itself must continue to grow, but we must also build a direct democracy platform, and use it to keep the system in check and enforce positive changes.

Just as importantly, we must build a roadmap of the knowledge and actions required for the creation of self-sustaining and highly evolved communities, and the way such communities can positively influence the world around them. This combination of human activism and occupation, massively direct and focused democracy using virtual platforms mixed with immediate change, immediate, and the building of fundamentally healthy communities that support citizenship and take advantage of the full potential of biological and mental flows – is the only thing that can truly change the world.

Every problem, local, national or global, must be immediately seen and tackled for what it is – something which threatens someone’s integrity and life. This is how you occupy a planet.

Without direct democratic action platforms, communities cannot positively change the conditions around them, and become vulnerable to government and global factors. Without building communities, the existing global factors are the only ones we can interact with – and that is a losing game.

I will be working on this knowledge roadmap, organizing virtual groups for the evolution of solutions. And I will try and wish to be there to physically and peacefully take every baton hit and pepper spray shot, which now seem to be mostly aimed at women. My physical structure can take them, because it is human, strong.

“If you do the task before you always adhering to strict reason with zeal and energy and yet with humanity, disregarding all lesser ends and keeping the divinity within you pure and upright, as though you were even now faced with its recall – if you hold steadily to this, staying for nothing and shrinking from nothing, only seeking in each passing action a conformity with nature and in each word and utterance a fearless truthfulness, then the good life shall be yours. And from this course no man has the power to hold you back.” Emperor Marcus Aurelius.

Concentration and equanimity conquer all things.

vineri, 24 februarie 2012

Covenant - Humility

Behold the beauty that surrounds us
See the wonders we take for granted
Roam the world in all her glory
Sail the seas and climb the mountains

Discover things you never knew
Be happy that you're alive
So many reasons to remain
So many people to embrace
So many stories to be told
So many errors to correct

Turn your gaze towards the moon
Even further if you dare
Turn your face towards the sun
And be grateful that it's there



Behold the beauty we have made us
All the wonders that we created
See the cities of the ancients
In the deserts and the jungles

See the truth you always knew
Be happy that you're alive
So many reasons to remain
So many people to embrace
So many questions to be asked
So many answers to be found

joi, 2 februarie 2012

Schimbarea? Fa-o tu!


"Nu se face nimic in tara asta"
"toata lumea fura"
"tinerii sunt niste pierde-vara fara bun simt"
"romanul e nascut sa fie subjugat"

Astea sunt cateva dintre cliseele pe care ne-am obisnuit atat de mult sa le folosim, incat chiar si cand realitatea ni le contrazice, tot ne e greu sa nu continuam sa vedem lucrurile in negru. De asemenea, ne e foarte usor sa dam vina pe politicieni, pe "romanism", pe diversi inamici pentru situatiile in care suntem si nu ne plac. Sau, mi s-a intamplat chiar sa scot in evidenta un lucru pozitiv pe care l-am observat legat de niste produse romanesti, iar replica pe care am primit-o a fost ca... e doar un accident ca sunt in regula, e imposibil ca romanii sa nu fure!

Dar, am vesti pentru voi... ceva, ceva se schimba in tara, chiar daca nu toti avem ochi sa observam.
- Am vazut batrani, din aceia crescuti la tara si probabil cu mentalitate comunista, chinuindu-se sa se deplaseze pe gheata pana la containerele de reciclare sa arunce gunoaiele pe care le pastrasera selectiv (desi  in urma cu cateva luni recunosc, ma apucase si pe mine deznadejdea vazand stilul unora de-a arunca in gunoi la gramada totul sau de-a arunca pet-uri si cutii de conserve chiar de pe fereastra, ce sa le pese lor de curatenie si poluare).
- Am prieteni care, intalnind un animal pe strada, si-au scos din geanta jumatatea de sandwich pe care nu l-au terminat la munca, si l-au oferit acelei fiinte amarate.
- Am vazut persoane punand deoparte langa ghene de gunoi, in locuri curate, cutii pline cu haine si obiecte nefolositoare lor, in ideea de a fi gasite de altii mai neajutorati; sau in hipermarketuri, am constatat cu placere cum cosurile amplasate pentru victimele inundatiilor, erau pline cu donatii in alimente si diverse materiale.
- Am cunocut tineri care din proprie initiativa, fara indrumarea vreunui ONG sau alte institutii, s-au dus inarmati cu saci si cu bete, sa adune resturile aruncate de altii in zonele turistice sau pe malurile raurilor.
- Calatorind, am avut ocazia sa vad case (atentie, nu vile de bogatani) cu fantani in curte si gradini de legume foarte bine amenajate, sau cu panouri solare.


Exemplele pot continua, dar cred ca fiecare, daca lasa la o parte valul scepticismului de pe ochi, ar putea gasi cate ceva, poate infim, care se face in tara asta.

Am fost crescuta cu mentalitatea "de ce sa dau, mie-mi da cineva?" si mi-a luat mult sa scap de frica de a nu avea destul. am constatat ca fiecare om are ceva de oferit, de la un obiect pe care nu-l foloseste, la cateva minute din timpul sau pentru a indruma un trecator sau a sustine un prieten demoralizat.

Imaginati-va putin, daca tot mai multi oameni ar fi mai dispusi sa ofere si sa ajute, si ceilalti, treptat, s-ar destinde vazand ca nu toti lupta pentru sine cu indarjire. In fond, suntem fiinte gregare , asa ca, daca tot avem nevoie de semeni in jur, hai sa contribuim la a avea in preajma unii mai binevoitori.

Intrebarea mea e... in loc sa asteptam sa se schimbe regimul politic, sau  sa vina altii sa ne mobilizeze, de ce sa nu incepem fiecare cu gesturi mici, aceasta schimbare despre care ne tot place sa vorbim? De ce sa nu transformam iubirea despre care se tot vorbeste prin toate gruparile de "gandire pozitiva" in fapte, chiar si daca acestea au loc in intimitatea vietii noastre private si nu sub privirile publicului, si nu suntem recompensati pe moment pentru gesturile noastre?

luni, 21 noiembrie 2011

Trezirea spirituala : viziune alternativa :)


GATEWAYS:


The core principle of freedom
Is the only notion to obey
The formulae of evolution and sin
Leading the way


The rebirth is near compeletion
As we slowly awaken from slumber


The malpractice of the spirit ends
Gateways!
While the gift is once again attained
Gateways!
No rules or restraints are no longer valid
Gateways!
While the ancient future is reclaimed
Gateways


Its all there for the eyes that can see
The blind ones will always suffer in secrecy
For it is the omen
Of what lies submerged - breeding
Untouched within us - bleeding


To receive the light that shines in darkness
The light that shines forevermore


Be the broken or the breaker
Be the giver or the undertaker
Unlock and open the doors
Be the healer or the faker
The keys are in your hands
Realize you are your own sole creator
Of your own masterplan


Artist: Dimmu Borgir
Album: Abrahadabra (2010)


luni, 10 octombrie 2011

Revolutia mondiala si...trezirea constiintei colective

Postare de pe facebook, la o invitatie spre Revolutia pasnica:
Anca Todirica
Dragilor se pare ca energia iubirii in mod special a celor treziti in constiinta a ajuns la maturitatea ei, atingand culmea prin imputernicire si fermitate .A spune" Nu permit " este o mare lectie de imputernicire si fermitate .Este defapt iubirea care incepe sa se manifeste .CAre iesa din noi si se vrea materializata ,manifestata .Sunt convinsa ca aceasta miscare pasnica si iubitoare va aduce mari treziri in constiinta de masa .Asa sa fie cum si este !
Acum, vreo saptamana, cand scriam la articolul anterior despre schimbarile sociale inevitabile care au loc intr-una si care sunt asociate cu crize economice si morale, nu ma asteptam sa asistam atat de repede la inceputul uneia din ele . Intre timp, au ajuns si la mine informatiile privind evenimentul planificat pentru 15 oct, si anume acea “revolutie mondiala pasnica”. Nu, nu cred ca va schimba brusc sistemul, nu sunt sigura nici ca va fi intr-adevar pasnica, dar nu asta e ideea. Simplul fapt ca suficienti oameni s-au gandit sa initieze o asemenea actiune arata ca sistemul capitalist e pe cale sigura spre distrugere, indiferent daca aceasta va avea loc chiar acum sau in urmatorii ani.

Dar subiectul articolului de fata nu este criza economica ce-a determinat acest eveniment, ci asocierile de natura “spirituala” pe care le fac oamenii  cu acesta. Am vorbit ultima data de acest curent inspirat din New Age care considera ca suntem bombardati de mesaje de la extraterestri sau spirite inaltate, si care sustin sus si tare ca urmeaza o trezire colectiva spirituala. Ei bine, acesti oameni vad la momentul de fata ca miscarile politic –economice sunt rezultatul acestei treziri, si nu invers …cum de fapt stau lucrurile.

Va intreb acum pe voi, cei care aveti impresia ca din cauza… constiintei voastre inalte doriti schimbarea: ati reactionat vreunul la faptul ca in Africa mor mii de copii zilnic? La faptul ca padurile tropicale sunt distruse si apele poluate ? La conflictele armate pe teme religioase sau din cauza resurselor economice?  S-a gandit cineva sa porneasca  sau sa participe la o revolutie mondiala din aceste motive? Nu, pentru ca acestea erau fapte care nu va afectau Acum si care nu aveau loc in ograda voastra… Ati reactionat insa fix in clipa in care confortul vietii voastre cu apa calda, mancare la discretie, electronice cumparate in rate si tot pachetul, a inceput sa fie tot mai amenintat. Si de ce s-a ajuns la amenintarea acestui confort? Fix din cauza risipei la care si VOI ati contribuit, de s-a ajuns la aceasta criza economica, din care acum vreti sa scapati dand jos elitele, de parca schimbarea sistemului politic ar modifica cu ceva faptul ca resursele  de baza sunt pe cale de disparitie si ca ecosistemele ce mentineau echilibrul  vietii pe planeta asta abia mai rezista.Si mai si aveti ipocrizia sa afirmati ca faceti asta din iubire…Nu dragilor, se numeste NEVOIE impulsul care v-a facut sa luati atitudine.

Ce numesc eu constiinta inalta : sa fii capabil sa intelegi faptul ca suntem doar o parte mica a ce numim viata si ca fiecare specie, fiecare grup etnic are aceleasi drepturi de a se manifesta aici ca si tine; sa iti dai seama ca orice mica actiune de-a ta, acumulata la actiunile altora, determina evenimentele majore cu care te vei confrunta mai tarziu.
 Cat despre inaltarea spirituala, ma indoiesc ca revolta impotriva sistemului ar fi unul din efecte; nu credeti mai degraba ca o fiinta iluminata ar fi capabila sa vada dincolo de actiunile de aici si sa inteleaga cauzalitatea din spatele acestor fenomene, sa inteleaga ca orice manifestare in materie , oricat de buna sau rea ar parea de la nivelul de intelegere uman, isi are un scop mai mare si nu are rost sa fie intrerupta ?...

Acum na, poate am eu constiinta limitata si nu inteleg, dar… ceva imi spune ca o revolutie mondiala bazata pe Spirit ar trebui sa insemne schimbare interioara autentica (din care sa porneasca in mod natural o alta atitudine exterioara), nu mimare a noii turme si nicidecum revolta la lipsurile personale materiale.

Si inca un pasaj  care mi-a atras atentia , de data asta in mod placut : 
Nu recunoaştem decât ceea ce ştim. De aceea am pus întrebarea: vrem schimbare, dar ştim ce schimbare vrem?? Poate vrem doar să ajungem în locul celor care nu fac decât să stea cu biciul pe alţii...

 Revolution now

"For all who didn't get it yet
We're living in the age of change
That means you should change yourself
Don't wait until the others will

You have the power to change the world
Small reason huge effects

Time is running away
Second for second
Break out of your mind-cage
And control your rage
You're responsible
Understand that
Don't be a cogwheel anymore

Don't sit there
Move your ass
One is all
And all is one

Every little thing you do
Causes huge effects
The whole world
Depends on your actions
You're responsible
Understand that

The moon is red
The sun burns
Time is running away
Second for second"

 Artist : Project Pitchfork
Album : Alpha Omega


joi, 29 septembrie 2011

Trezirea spirituala. Perspectiva istorico-sociala


Pentru ca atat in Romania cat si in majoritatea tarilor ce apartin culturii vestice se vehiculeaza foarte intens idei despre faptul ca asistam la vremuri fara precedent din punct de vedere spiritual, am decis sa abordez acest subiect , analizand atat elementele ce formeaza acest curent, cat si importanta lui dintr-o perspectiva mai larga, aceea a evenimentelor istorice.

Ca sa fiu mai exacta, datorita faptului ca tot mai multi oameni cauta sa priveasca viata si din alt punct decat cel material, ca mass-media e tot mai asaltata de subiecte esoterice, si nu in ultimul rand  pentru ca in unele locuri din lume apar conflicte armate, revolte etc, iata ca sunt voci care interpreteaza aceste lucruri drept semnale cum ca omenirea se indreapta spre o noua etapa din punct de vedere spiritual, etapa care va incepe printr-o "trezire" a constiintelor individuale, o iluminare in masa, cum am auzit la unii.

Inca din start, ideea ca oamenii s-ar putea destepta cu totii concomitent mi se pare pur utopica, si voi pomeni aici numai de argumentele sociologice ( o abordare pur spirituala a ideii de trezire in masa va urma intr-un alt articol , probabil pe plerion.blogspot.com). De ce? Pai e suficient sa aruncam o privire in istorie , si ma refer aici la orice perioada istorica, din orice regiune a lumii, in care a existat ceea ce numim civilizatie, ca sa vedem ca intotdeauna, in orice colectiv uman numeros, a existat o patura restransa de intelepti ( preoti, eruditi etc ) , una de lideri politici si... restul maselor: agricultori, mestesugari si alte categorii, priceputi fiecare in domeniul sau, dar ignoranti in ce priveste aprofundarea spirituala sau oricum, lipsiti de o viziune de ansamblu la care se ajunge prin experimentare diversa si auto-educare . Si asta pentru ca pur si simplu asa functioneaza societatea, fiecare are rolul lui in ea , exact ca intr-un sistem viu unde fiecare tesut compus din celule are functia lui oricat de banala ar parea si fara care nu ar putea exista Organismul.

E diferit omul de rand de azi de omul de rand din , de exemplu, antichitate? Parerea mea e ca nu. Da, omul obisnuit de azi a auzit ca Pamantul se invarte in jurul Soarelui, stie ce e ala  electron , gaura neagra si multe altele, dar raportat la specialistii vremurilor actuale, e la fel de ignorant precum era un taran din Grecia Antica fatza de un preot din templul lui Apollo. Faptul ca omul de rand de azi are frigider in casa nu inseamna ca stie sa si construiasca unul si tot asa, faptul ca televiziunile si internetul vuiesc de subiecte spirituale nu-l fac pe cel ce preia subiecte mai "inaltat" sufleteste. Pe scurt, vorbitul despre lucruri inalte nu te face automat luminat, mai degraba e vorba de simpla si naturala tendinta a speciei de a imita, dupa cum sugereaza si cuvintele unui vizir egiptean, Ptah-Hotep, din sec 25 B.C. :  "Discursurile intelepte sunt mai rare decat pietrele de smarald, si totusi sunt populare printre servitoarele care macina granele"


Asa cum pe taranul  din Egipt , cunoasterea detaliata a naturii nu-l impiedica sa creada in spirite ale locurilor, tot asa si pe omul modern, familiarizarea cu stiinta nu-l impiedica sa creada in ingeri sau spirite incarnate de pe alte planete. ATENTIE: nu incerc aici sa iau in ras nici o credinta, incerc doar sa demonstrez ca progresul tehnologic si accesul la mai multa informatie nu are nici o legatura cu credintele si nivelul spiritual al oamenilor.

Exista pe History Channel o serie de documentare extrem de interesanta, numita "Ancient Discoveries"; ei bine, in episodul Machines Of The Gods, am aflat cum preotii antici se foloseau de cunostinte destul de avansate de fizica si chimie pentru a crea "miracole" in temple, cu scopul de a impresiona credinciosii: statui care leviteaza, care plang , altare a caror flacara se aprindea dupa ce credinciosul lasa ofranda , usi care se deschideau singure de parca stiau cand cineva astepta la intrare.... Impresionant, nu? Si totusi nu, nu cred ca respectivii preoti nu erau nimic altceva decat sarlatani; mai degraba cred ca erau foarte intelepti, suficient incat sa stie ca masele nu ar putea digera adevarul  sau ar folosi in scopuri meschine cunoasterea daca li s-ar da acces la ea, asa ca au decis sa transmita cunostintele sacre unui numar restrans, oferind multimii ceea ce dorea.

Revenind la subiect: omul normal din vremurile noastre nu a evoluat cu nimic fatza de cel din trecut, raporturile dintre clase  fiind acelasi; e vorba doar ca odata cu inmultirea excesiva a specimenelor umane, automat a crescut si fluxul de informatie din societate. Faptul ca exista mai mare preocupare catre spiritualitate? Stati asa, mai mare in raport cu ce perioada? Ca daca ne gandim numai la obsesia omului medieval fata de Divin, la frica acestuia de sfarsitul lumii, ne dam seama ca ce se intampla acum e complet banal. Da, in contextul in care Romania abia a iesit din comunism unde tot ce nu era axat pe material si social era considerat superstitie, sau daca ne gandim ca intreaga civilizatie occidentala trece acum prin pragmaticul capitalism ... atunci interesul sporit catre planul spiritual poate parea un semn ca ceva se schimba.

Dar evident ca se schimba! Intotdeauna au fost schimbari, intotdeauna vor aparea curente  materialiste, urmate de unele spiritualiste si mereu se vor rasturna unele pe altele, vor ajunge fiecare la un apogeu si vor fi inlocuite cand oamenii vor simti ca devin exagerate. Astfel, decadenta din Imperiul roman a dus la aparitia crestinismului ca religie oficiala; superstitia si nebunia Evului Mediu a dus la ideile renascentiste de respingere a credintei in favoarea stiintei; materialismul epocii industriale a dus catre revolutii umaniste si a creat ideile comunismului...si uite asa, curentul asta spiritualist de azi e pur si simplu o reactie sociala la ateismul capitalist si la criza economica , morala si ecologica a epocii noastre.

Un mic exemplu istoric , ca sa vedeti ca entuziasmul catre o schimbare spirituala majora nu e ceva nou pe planeta asta:  infiltrarea crestinsmului in Imperiul Roman.  Ce m-a mirat pe mine initial a fost cum e posibil ca intr-o societate cu atat de multe credinte , populatia sa ajunga sa doreasca sa aleaga un singur zeu? Dar studiind mai profund, am realizat ca in realitate , mai multi factori au contribuit la aceasta nevoie de schimbare, inclusiv cel economic. Iata care era situatia printre romani in secolele respective: tocmai datorita fluxului de zeitati de la popoarele vecine, romanii devenisera aproape atei pastrand ritualurile mai mult din motive sociale, iar pretutindeni se simtea nevoia unei credinte aparte care sa redea omului speranta in viata de dincolo si in recompensa. De asemenea, economic vorbind, se ajunsese la un punct mort, deoarece imperiul care pana atunci se folosise de productia din  provincii si teritoriile cucerite pentru a satisface nevoile tot mai sofisticate ale cetatenilor incepea sa ramana fara resurse. In plus, micii agricultori si mestesugari se vedeau murind de foame din cauza afacerilor marilor nobili, care produceau ieftin folosindu-si sclavii . Nici politic situatia nu era foarte stabila, deja de cateva secole puterea era smulsa prin forta militara de diversi generali care se proclamau imparati in loc sa se transmita  tronul ca pana atunci pe linie genetica, si dupa cum stiti, in final s-a ajuns la divizarea imperiului , fiecare regiune avand alt lider. In lumina acestor framantari , atractia catre noul val spiritual reprezentat de crestinism a venit foarte natural: o doctrina care sa proclame toti oamenii egali in ochii divinitatii, un zeu care a murit pentru ca oamenii sa fie salvati, ideea ca dupa moarte se va scapa de suferinta.... Adica fix sperantele  de care avea nevoie o populatie aflata in nesiguranta atat spiritual cat si economic. Oricum , despre cat s-au "trezit" pe atunci oamenii in urma crestinarii in masa, puteti vedea foarte clar in Agora

Asa ca revenind la vremurile in care traim , repet : nu, eu nu vad nici o trezire spirituala, ci doar un curent soteriologic dezvoltat ca reactie la sistemul capitalist ( poate ar trebui sa ne dea de gandit de ce in tari precum India, Rusia , China si altele unde nu sunt aceleasi probleme si  nu predomina aceeasi paradigma sociala, n-au prins atat de isteric ideile astea... ), care evident ca va fi si el parasit la fel ca oricare alt sistem de dinaintea lui in momentul in care anumite caracteristici ale sale vor deveni exagerate. Faptul ca schimbarile au loc incontinuu, ca evenimente se succed, aducand ceva nou dar in acelasi timp reluand tipare vechi, iata ce numesc eu evolutie in spirala, si singura "trezire" despre care aleg sa vorbesc la nivel colectiv este cea care tine de obtinerea intelepciunii prin a invata din ce ni se intampla atat pe plan individual cat si ca nivel de  istorie a speciei, ca sa ne putem usura viata in societate. Atata timp cat refuzi sa studiezi, dar te entuziasmezi/ sperii la orice schimbare (care evident la nivel de experienta personala si atat pare fara precedent si extraordinara) , si automat te supui manipularii publice, nu prea ai cum sa atingi un nivel inalt de constiinta, cum le place unora sa formuleze.

 “Knowledge is freedom and ignorance is slavery” - Miles Davis
 

vineri, 5 august 2011

Paradoxuri ale crestinismului 2 - laicii

Fiindca pe buna dreptate, dupa cum m-a atentionat si Vreauultimulloc ( ale carui pareri le respect foarte mult, in ciuda viziunilor diferite) , in postarea precedenta am punctat in special comportamentul clerului crestin , de data asta as vrea sa continui cu cateva observatii referitoare la masele de credinciosi. Mai precizez , desi stiu ca aceste cuvinte nu le vor vedea decat cei deschisi la minte, ca nu vad nimic rau in invataturile celui pe care il cunoastem drept Iisus Christos , in schimb incerc sa atrag atentia asupra absurditatilor la care a ajuns crestinismul in prezent.
 Deci cum spuneam mai sus , hai sa observam putin "micile" diferente dintre atitudinea pe care spun preotii si cartile sfinte  ca trebuie s-o aiba niste crestini si comportamentul real al acestora...

Intoleranta - Iisus spune sa iti iubesti aproapele chiar daca e diferit de tine ; filosofii crestini spun sa iubesti si sa ierti.... totusi , pentru multi crestini din prezent, a fi ateu sau de alta religie e o crima si ar fi in stare sa introduca drept lege interzicerea oricarei alte manifestari spirituale , uitand ca diversitatea e tot de la Dumnezeu.

Agresivitatea - Nu am putut sa nu remarc faptul ca toti acesti oameni care pe internet au numai lumina si iubire pe buze cat timp vor sa te converteasca, devin extrem de agresivi odata ce vad ca nu vei fi de acord cu ei si o dau in atacuri la persoana si amenintari cu iadul si altele. Vorbesc doar de cei de pe internet, pentru ca in viata reala stau cat pot de departe de orice discutie cu asemenea oameni , dar cunosc totusi cazuri de cunoscuti care au fost asaltati pentru ca au avut naivitatea sa se declare atei in public.

Pacatuirea in general - Nu stiu daca ati observat ca mai toti acei betivi de la stiri care si-au omorat nevasta, batut vecinul, eventual s-au spanzurat in pod erau "oameni cu frica lui d-zeu", dupa cum afirma ei plangand in vreun reportaj in care sunt vazuti facandu-si cruce la politie sau, in caz de sinucidere, dupa relatarile vecinilor. Scuza e in general faptul ca viata grea i-a dus la disperare, dar , oare nu scrie in Biblie ca incercarile grele sunt de la Dumnezeu si trebuie sa le acceptam si pe alea, daca avem credinta?

Vanitatea - Iisus a fost sarac, si asa ar fi crestineste sa traiasca si adeptii lui... De unde atunci obsesia pentru biserici cat mai impodobite, impopotonare la slujbe (dupa care femeile stau si comenteaza vestimentatia celorlalte, fiindca oricum mersul la slujbe a devenit  o obligatie sociala ca sa-ti pastrezi statutul in comunitate, nu o nevoie spirituala sincera, pentru majoritatea enoriasilor). Macar preotii catolici au acele haine simple, spre deosebire de costumatiile stralucitoare ale celor ortodocsi, care arata pe parca ar fi imparati bizantini. Nu cred ca multi stiu asta, dar primii crestini se strangeau in case sau catacombe si acolo se rugau in liniste sau faceau schimb de sfaturi si se ajutau intre ei, fara sa aiba nevoie de cladiri cu vitralii si fara sa conteze cu ce s-au dus imbracati. Ca sa nu mai zic de faptul ca nu pupau icoane suflate cu aur si oase de sfinti in sicrie impodobite ....si uite asa am ajuns la inca o chestiune numita idolatrie ( sa nu-ti faci chip cioplit pe care sa-l venerezi , mai tineti minte? )

Lenea - Se spune ca Dumnezeu iti da, dar nu-ti baga si-n buzunar... in schimb , credinciosii de azi stau si se roaga sa le pice bani la Loto sau  sa li se marite fata cu vreun bogatan, in loc sa isi foloseasca mintea si forta fizica pe care tot de la El considera ca au primit-o, sa ca o scoata la capat cumva. Ca sa nu mai pomenesc de cersetoria " in numele domnului", unde oameni perfect capabili de munca profita de naivitatea unora ca sa o duca bine (evident, se exclud de aici batranii si bolnavii saraci, care nu stiu daca ati observat, dar stau linistiti si asteapta sa primeasca, nu te sufoca cu insistentele lor precum cei mentionati mai sus).

Erezia - Suntem buni crestini, dar tot ne rugam pe sfanta cruce  sa ni se imbolnaveasca dusmanii, sau mergem la preot sa "citeasca in carte", cum se zice la acea forma de divinatie acceptata  neoficial de Biserica. Sa nu mai vorbesc de sarbatorile total pagane gen Sanzienele in cadrul carora sunt pastrate vechi superstitii si se fac vraji care n-au nici o treaba cu invataturile biblice. Cumva, ce se intampla aici e echivalentul practicilor sud-americane unde se imbina catolicismul cu magia africana si amerindiana si tuturor li se pare perfect normal sa aiba in casa, langa crucifixul cu Cristos rastignit,  picioare de cocos,  papusi voodoo, amulete magice de protectie si altele.

Si in final , lacomia , despre care nu pot da alt exemplu mai bun decat in scenele de mai jos: 



miercuri, 6 iulie 2011

Paradoxuri ale crestinismului

Marea religie pacifista a lumii.... izvor de iluminare si iubire pentru aproape... Dar hai sa analizam mai indeaproape doctrina crestina si cum o da de fapt in bara in practica...

 Voia Domnului - Desigur, Dumnezeu e Atotputernic si Atostiitor si nu lasa sa aiba loc pe lume decat ceea ce ii serveste scopurilor si ii face placere; si totusi , de-a lungul istoriei, s-au gasit destui lideri religiosi sau politici care sa convinga multimile ca masurile lor radicale indeplinesc voia divina, ca sa nu mai vorbesc de fanaticii de rand care au ucis ceea ce ei considerau abominatii in randul omenirii. Ori, daca totul se intampla dupa voia Domnului, inseamna ca El n-are nici o problema cu paganii, ateii, homosexualii sau orice alte categorii pe care crestinii le blameaza si se simt indreptatiti sa le atace. De asemenea, nici cu adulterul, drogurile , foametea, virusii etc.

Liberul arbitru - Cica Dumnezeu i-a dat omului libertate sa faca orice alegeri, sa decida singur daca sa se indrepte spre Rai sau spre Iad... si totusi , tot filosofii si "parintii" crestini  care au scos-o pe-asta cu libertatea, afirma ca totul e stabilit de la inceputul Creatiei, ca deja din start "s-au separat oile de capre" si ca soarta fiecaruia e pecetluita dinainte de nastere. Pai si-atunci, de ce sa se mai chinuie unii sa faca bine, sa se pocaiasca, daca divinitatea aia milostiva le-a dat ...libertatea de-a merge in Iad?

Crima - A ucide e pacat de moarte; nu si cand te absolva papa sau episcopul de vina, daca te duci si-i omori niste rivali , pardon, dusmani ai Adevaratei credinte...

 Iertarea aproapelui - Da, exact, asa cum au fost iertati si ereticii  si vrajitoarele, toti arsi pe rug si torturati  in Evul Mediu; ca aceia puteau alege sa marturiseasca si sa se pocaiasca... si apoi tot erau arsi, dar cica asa mergeau in Rai ;)

Bunurile materiale - Sa traiesti in saracie, zice Biserica, desi daca ma gandesc bine, singua replica cu adresa la bogatie care ii e atribuita lui  Iisus e aia cu : " mai repede intra o camila prin gaura unui ac decat un bogat in Imparatia Domnului". Pai daca asa stau lucrurile, sa inteleg ca jumatate din cler va ramane pe afara, cu toate averile lor pesonale si manastiresti....
informatie pentru delectare - la catolici treaba cu celibatul preotilor a fost o simpla masura papala pentru ca averile preotilor sa revina Bisericii dupa moartea lor si nu urmasilor; initial preotii  catolici se casatoreau, deoarece se considera asta o initiere, cum inca se intampla la ortodocsi, in taina casatoriei

Stiintele oculte - Astrologia, practicile divinatorii etc sunt ori de la diavol, ori niste "amagiri" , cum afirma chiar Arsenie Boca. Interesant e insa ca printre principalele argumente despre importanta lui Iisus e chiar povestea cu magii, initiati in artele oculte, si care afla din astrologie despre nasterea cea speciala; sa inteleg ca daca astrologia e diavoleasca, magii au fost directionati inspre un , cum ar zice preotii, inselator al oamenilor  ?  

 Doar astea mi-au venit acum in minte, dar  revin oricum , abia am inceput ;)

Despre cum si-a modificat  conceptiile Biserica de-a lungul timpului in functie de interese, mai cititi si aici: